Vehicle Spy MEP supports two methods for collecting data from an ECU using CCP/XCP. Each method has strengths and weaknesses when compared to each other as shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Comparison of DAQ Methods Using CCP/XCP
Category
Standard DAQ Method
Event Based DAQ Method
Measurement Rate
User controls how often a measurement is reported.
ECU software determines rate based upon a user assigned event.
Resource Usage
Each request triggers only one measurement. This can put more strain on the network and ECU if many measurements are needed.
Only one request is needed to trigger multiple measurements. This can reduce the strain on the network and ECU if many measurements are needed.
Synchronization
Time synchronization is unlikely for a group of measurements.
Time synchronization occurs for a group of measurements assigned to the same event.
Standard DAQ Method
To perform standard data acquisition over CCP/XCP:\
As shown in Figure 1, the DAQ Delays in MEP determine the update rates of A2L items in VehicleScape DAQ depending on their chosen priorities. Lower delay times will make measurements appear closer to "real time", but also take up more network bandwidth and ECU resources.
Figure 1: Standard DAQ'ing with CCP/XCP is established with DAQ Delays in MEP being assigned to A2L item priorities in VehicleScape DAQ.
Event Based DAQ Method
To perform event based data acquisition over CCP/XCP:
As shown in Figure 2, the ECU software determines the update rate of A2L items in VehicleScape DAQ depending on which event the items are assigned to. Events can help synchronize measurements and reduce resources allocated to DAQ'ing. One event request can trigger multiple measurements instead of using separate DAQ requests for each measurement.